ABSTRACT
COVID-19‘s impact on the daily lives of millions of urban residents around the world has been significant, yet next to many humans are companion animals who have shared the "lockdown” experience. Much as the pandemic has upended human socio-economic lives, the pandemic has also upended companion animal lives, as well as the organizations working to help them in urban areas. This chapter, grounded in the perspective of animal geography, explores the positive and negative effects of COVID-19 on three U.S. animal advocacy organizations: two in Chicago, Illinois and one in Kansas City, Missouri. From early lockdown closures that temporarily stopped all direct care and outreach services, to a post-lockdown recognition of the increasing need for economic support to help families care for their companion animals, to the time lost managing feral populations, we show that the impact of COVID-19 cannot be seen as purely a human phenomenon, but must be seen as a more-than-human experience with long-term ramifications for human-animal relations in urban areas and beyond. © The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022.
ABSTRACT
This proceedings contains 96 papers on ocean biodiversity;breeding, reproduction, feeding and diseases of aquacultured fish and shellfish;water quality;fishery management, seafood preservation and quality;aquaculture and fishery economics and the impact of COVID-19 on aquaculture and fishery production.
ABSTRACT
Changes in human activities caused by the COVID-19 pandemic can have multiple effects on biodiversity but there is limited knowledge of how this can impact invasive alien species (IAS). Societal measures against the spread of COVID-19 can have both short-term and long-term consequences on IAS. In the short-term, reduced human disturbance on natural habitats can increase the activity of IAS and accelerate their spread. Furthermore, management agencies have reduced control activities, sometimes allowing IAS to thrive, and ongoing monitoring programs have been interrupted, hindering rapid identification and management of biological invasions. Long-term impacts could include global modifications to wildlife trade and increased releases of captive-bred species because of the fear of zoonotic diseases and also greater public awareness of the risks of pathogens being spread among animal populations. Long-term collection and sharing of data are crucial to modulate IAS management during and after the lockdowns.